Arvin Jur Ur

Reliability and asset management · Mongolia

Find the gaps before they stop the plant

We walk your site, find where operations and maintenance are losing hours, and give you a ranked plan: engineering solutions for safety, world-class practice for production, and a budget your management can approve line by line.

average level 1× running speed gear mesh bearing defect frequency amplitude

Illustrative vibration spectrum

Small defect→unplanned failure→production stoppage→lost output and emergency cost

The assessment

An operational and maintenance gap assessment, built from a site walk

We look at three areas. Each finding is tied to an action, the tool to do it with, and a priority, so the result is a work plan and not a report that sits on a shelf.

Safety and compliance

Remove personnel hazards, structural liabilities and regulatory risk.

  • Missing guards and edge protection
  • Structural integrity and inspection plans
  • Substandard work platforms
  • General workplace hazards

Mechanical reliability

Stop repeat failure loops and raise precision maintenance skills.

  • Freezing lines and gearboxes
  • V-belt failures
  • Cracked shafts and structural metals
  • Fan breakdowns and balancing
  • High or unexplained vibration

Operations and asset management

Modernise material flow, software tracking and communication.

  • Preventive maintenance planning
  • Liner and pipe wear rates
  • Breakdown registration for all equipment
  • Chutes, seals, lagging and belt tracking
  • Shutdown activity lists and team communication
  1. Site walk-down

    Inspect conveyors, fixed equipment, guarding, platforms, structures and stores on site.

  2. Findings and recommendations

    Every observation is paired with a recommended action, an engineering solution where one is needed, and the tool to carry it out.

  3. Rank the work

    Ranked by safety risk and downtime impact.Must-doShould-doCould-do

  4. Zero-based budget

    No carry-over. Each line is tied to a finding and priced as do nothing, minimum or full option, with the risk of each.

  5. Timeline

    Quick wins in 0–3 months, medium term in 3–12 months, longer-term studies after 12 months.

Example findings

What an assessment says: what we saw, what we recommend

Extract from a recent visit to a cement plant in Mongolia. The plant is not named.

What we observedOur recommendation
PM not defined or standardised, and not tied to shutdown planningDefine PM frequencies (daily or weekly to annual, hours or cycle based) and link PM tasks into shutdown scope
Predictive maintenance lacks definitions and consistent executionDefine techniques: vibration, oil analysis, thermography, ultrasonic, motor and electrical monitoring, trending
Work is mostly breakdown or corrective drivenIdentify critical equipment (safety, production impact, consequence) and focus planned prevention there
No standard shutdown activity listStructured shutdown follow-up: planning, readiness, execution and post-shutdown review
Job history unused; planned and actual hours not comparedUse the maintenance system consistently to capture job history and compare planned against actual labour hours

Better planning → better control → better execution → improved maintenance performance → cost control

Engineering solutions and best practice

Beyond the findings: how we make the plant safer and produce more

Where a gap needs a design fix, we specify the engineering solution. Where it needs a better way of working, we bring established world-class practice and fit it to your site.

Safer by design

Engineered fixes for personnel and structural risk.

Guarding and edge protectionGuard and barrier design for rotating parts and open edges
Work platforms and accessInspection and repair of platforms, especially where heavy material is staged
Structural integrityRecurring NDT-backed inspection plan; load capacity checks with structural analysis
Dust at conveyor transfersEngineered skirting, modified chutes and optimised impact idler spacing

More throughput

Fixes that remove chronic stoppages.

Chute wear and weld repairsStandardise on modular ceramic liners or Hardox wear plates
Belt misalignment and laggingRoot-cause tracking with laser belt trackers and auto-aligning idlers; right lagging type for each pulley
Freezing lines and seal leaksSeasonal oil grades, enclosed lines, trace heating; seals selected for speed and environment
V-belt and fan failuresMatched belt sets, laser sheave alignment, field balancing, dedicated torque tools

World-class practice

Ways of working that hold the gains.

Work management cycleIdentify→Plan→Schedule→Execute→Complete→Analyse
Criticality-based PM and predictive workFocus planned prevention on the equipment that matters most
Structured shutdownsStandard activity lists, readiness gates and a post-shutdown review
Daily and weekly planning meetingsField updates escalated across teams; defects and wear data recorded in the CMMS

Industries

A baseline for each type of plant

Select a plant type to see what we baseline, where failures start and which condition monitoring fits.

Baseline metrics
Equivalent availability factor, forced outage rate, planned outage factor, heat rate, load factor, starts per year
Critical systems
Boiler, turbine and generator, coal handling and mills, feed water pumps, fans, condenser, transformers and switchgear, ash handling
Typical failure modes
Boiler tube leaks, bearing and rotor vibration, liner and roller wear, fan imbalance, insulation breakdown, hot joints
Condition monitoring
Tube wall thickness (UT) and creep assessment, online turbine vibration, oil analysis, dissolved gas analysis, partial discharge, thermography
Shutdown pattern
Outages sit outside the heating season: annual boiler inspection, turbine overhaul on a multi-year cycle

Baseline and assessment

Measure first, then decide: the baseline behind RCM, shutdowns and condition monitoring

Every plant starts from the same baseline. It shows how reactive the site is today, where the downtime sits, and how much of the plant is monitored.

Baseline for RCM

  • Asset register and hierarchy
  • Criticality ranking
  • Failure and downtime history
  • Operating context
  • Planned vs reactive work mix
  • PM programme and compliance
  • Condition monitoring coverage
  • Shutdown history
  • Critical spares and materials
  • Safety and environmental events

Condition monitoring assessment

Five checks per critical asset:

  1. Can a known technique detect the dominant failure mode?
  2. Is it installed or scheduled on this asset?
  3. Is it sampled often enough to catch the warning period?
  4. Is the data trended in one place?
  5. Does an alarm lead to planned work?

Each asset scores level 0 to 3, from no monitoring to alarms that produce planned work with parts ready.

Shutdown optimisation

  • Scope control
  • Work pack quality
  • Parts and materials kitting
  • Critical path and duration
  • Resources and contractors
  • Emergent work
  • Execution control
  • Close-out and review
  • Restart quality

Each lever has a baseline measure and a target set with your team.

Current state vs world class

See where you are, and what world class looks like

We score your current practice on eight dimensions against world class operation, then rank the gaps by effect on availability, safety and cost.

  1. Reactive
  2. Preventive
  3. Predictive
  4. Proactive

Work management

Now Most work is reactive; planning and scheduling are informal

Target Under 5% emergency work; jobs planned, parts ready, weekly schedule held

Preventive maintenance

Now PM tasks copied from manuals; completion not tracked

Target PM above 95% on time, with tasks chosen from failure modes (RCM)

Condition monitoring

Now One or two techniques, ad hoc, data not acted on

Target Level 3 on critical assets: alarms produce planned work with parts ready

Shutdown management

Now Scope grows late; packs incomplete; overruns are normal

Target Scope frozen on a T-minus timeline, packs complete, parts kitted, critical path managed

Spares and materials

Now Stockouts on critical parts; no criticality-based stocking

Target Critical spares set by criticality, parts kitted to work orders

Failure data and analysis

Now Failures logged as “breakdown”; repeat failures not analysed

Target Failure codes, MTBF by asset, root cause analysis on the top losses

Safety

Now Isolation and permits depend on individuals; hazards found after incidents

Target Hazard review built into job plans; verified isolation; engineered controls first

Operations and ownership

Now Operators and maintenance work separately; OEE not measured

Target Operators do basic care; OEE measured by shift; shared reliability targets

Benchmarks are commonly used industry levels. We set the targets for your plant with your team.

Tools

A planner for weekly maintenance work

Plan the week, track PM compliance and see crew load in one place. Access is by approval.

Plant Maintenance Planner

  • Seven-day schedule with crew capacity by trade
  • PM work orders generated from your PM plans
  • Backlog, overdue work and equipment register
  • Annual plan view to spot overloaded weeks

Send a request and we will reply once approved.

Request access Already approved? Open the planner

If you have not been approved, the planner will ask you to sign in and will not open.

Services

Assess, support onsite, then engineer the fix

Assessments show where to look. Our team then supports the plant onsite and designs engineering solutions from the assessment results.

  1. Assess
  2. Rank the gaps
  3. Support onsite
  4. Engineer the fix
  5. Verify results

Condition monitoring

  • Online condition monitoring for smart plants
  • Vibration analysis
  • Thermography testing
  • Oil analysis

NDT and inspection

  • Magnetic particle testing
  • Ultrasonic testing
  • Visual inspections
  • Thickness tests
  • Electromagnetic rope testing and Winspect camera
  • Rope back-end and other inspections

Planning and reliability

  • Reliability-centred maintenance
  • Preventive and predictive maintenance programs
  • Work management process
  • Shutdown planning and readiness
  • Zero-based maintenance budgets
  • Engineering studies: structural load checks, lagging, seals, chute liners, belt tracking

Maintenance systems and improvement

  • CMMS or eMaint selection and setup for maintenance planning
  • Asset register, work order flow, PM schedules and failure codes
  • Defect elimination process: log, rank, find root cause, fix, track
  • Regular reviews that turn repeat failures into operational improvements

Onsite support

  • Field dynamic balancing of fans and rotors
  • Condition monitoring routes and reports by our team
  • Laser shaft alignment and vibration checks after repair
  • Inspection support during shutdowns

Engineering solutions

  • Designed from your assessment results and ranked gaps
  • Wear protection, structural fixes and safer guarding and access
  • Redesigned PM, condition monitoring and shutdown scope
  • Results checked against the baseline measures

Shutdown management

A shutdown is won before it starts

The objective: complete the required work safely, within the planned duration, within budget and at the required quality, then return the plant to operation reliably.

T-14 to T-12Establish shutdown
T-11 to T-6Draft schedule
T-5 to T-3Final schedule; authorise scope amendment
T-2Shutdown readiness
T-1Mobilise shutdown
TPerform and record work
T+1Close-out and review
After T+1Agreed improvement actions
  • Shutdown ManagerOverall shutdown accountability
  • Shutdown PlannerScope, job plans and job readiness
  • SchedulerIntegrated schedule and progress tracking
  • OperationsShutdown, isolation, handover and start-up
  • Maintenance SupervisorField execution
  • Supply/ProcurementMaterials and services
  • HSE/SafetySafety requirements and assurance

Team

Operations, maintenance and reliability people

Bayarmagnai Barsed

Reliability and asset management

Operations and maintenance leader across fixed plant operations, underground mining and industrial processing, with over a decade at Rio Tinto. Experience in concentrator plants, underground hoisting and critical fixed plant assets, leading teams and managing contractors. Mechanical engineer.

Ankhbayar Turbat

Reliability and asset management

More than 15 years in mining, underground fixed plant maintenance, condition monitoring, non-destructive testing and equipment integrity. Leads multidisciplinary reliability programs, facilitates root cause analysis and delivers predictive maintenance for critical mining assets.

Adilbish Tseveen

Maintenance and shutdown planning

Planned maintenance, shutdown preparation, work management, scheduling, readiness tracking and execution coordination. Focus on quality work packs, scope control and better planning data, working with maintenance management systems and cross-functional teams.

Contact

Tell us about your plant

Send us a short note and these four items. We use them to scope the visit and to price each budget line.

  • Plant type and main equipment
  • Last year's maintenance spend and downtime data
  • Counterparts for maintenance, shutdown planning and HSE
  • Problem areas you already know about

Write to us at:

customerservice@arvinjurur.com
+976 80069530