Safety and compliance
Remove personnel hazards, structural liabilities and regulatory risk.
- Missing guards and edge protection
- Structural integrity and inspection plans
- Substandard work platforms
- General workplace hazards
Reliability and asset management · Mongolia
We walk your site, find where operations and maintenance are losing hours, and give you a ranked plan: engineering solutions for safety, world-class practice for production, and a budget your management can approve line by line.
Illustrative vibration spectrum
The assessment
We look at three areas. Each finding is tied to an action, the tool to do it with, and a priority, so the result is a work plan and not a report that sits on a shelf.
Remove personnel hazards, structural liabilities and regulatory risk.
Stop repeat failure loops and raise precision maintenance skills.
Modernise material flow, software tracking and communication.
Inspect conveyors, fixed equipment, guarding, platforms, structures and stores on site.
Every observation is paired with a recommended action, an engineering solution where one is needed, and the tool to carry it out.
Ranked by safety risk and downtime impact.Must-doShould-doCould-do
No carry-over. Each line is tied to a finding and priced as do nothing, minimum or full option, with the risk of each.
Quick wins in 0–3 months, medium term in 3–12 months, longer-term studies after 12 months.
Example findings
Extract from a recent visit to a cement plant in Mongolia. The plant is not named.
| What we observed | Our recommendation |
|---|---|
| PM not defined or standardised, and not tied to shutdown planning | Define PM frequencies (daily or weekly to annual, hours or cycle based) and link PM tasks into shutdown scope |
| Predictive maintenance lacks definitions and consistent execution | Define techniques: vibration, oil analysis, thermography, ultrasonic, motor and electrical monitoring, trending |
| Work is mostly breakdown or corrective driven | Identify critical equipment (safety, production impact, consequence) and focus planned prevention there |
| No standard shutdown activity list | Structured shutdown follow-up: planning, readiness, execution and post-shutdown review |
| Job history unused; planned and actual hours not compared | Use the maintenance system consistently to capture job history and compare planned against actual labour hours |
Better planning → better control → better execution → improved maintenance performance → cost control
Engineering solutions and best practice
Where a gap needs a design fix, we specify the engineering solution. Where it needs a better way of working, we bring established world-class practice and fit it to your site.
Engineered fixes for personnel and structural risk.
Fixes that remove chronic stoppages.
Ways of working that hold the gains.
Industries
Select a plant type to see what we baseline, where failures start and which condition monitoring fits.
Baseline and assessment
Every plant starts from the same baseline. It shows how reactive the site is today, where the downtime sits, and how much of the plant is monitored.
Five checks per critical asset:
Each asset scores level 0 to 3, from no monitoring to alarms that produce planned work with parts ready.
Each lever has a baseline measure and a target set with your team.
Current state vs world class
We score your current practice on eight dimensions against world class operation, then rank the gaps by effect on availability, safety and cost.
Now Most work is reactive; planning and scheduling are informal
Target Under 5% emergency work; jobs planned, parts ready, weekly schedule held
Now PM tasks copied from manuals; completion not tracked
Target PM above 95% on time, with tasks chosen from failure modes (RCM)
Now One or two techniques, ad hoc, data not acted on
Target Level 3 on critical assets: alarms produce planned work with parts ready
Now Scope grows late; packs incomplete; overruns are normal
Target Scope frozen on a T-minus timeline, packs complete, parts kitted, critical path managed
Now Stockouts on critical parts; no criticality-based stocking
Target Critical spares set by criticality, parts kitted to work orders
Now Failures logged as “breakdown”; repeat failures not analysed
Target Failure codes, MTBF by asset, root cause analysis on the top losses
Now Isolation and permits depend on individuals; hazards found after incidents
Target Hazard review built into job plans; verified isolation; engineered controls first
Now Operators and maintenance work separately; OEE not measured
Target Operators do basic care; OEE measured by shift; shared reliability targets
Benchmarks are commonly used industry levels. We set the targets for your plant with your team.
Tools
Plan the week, track PM compliance and see crew load in one place. Access is by approval.
Send a request and we will reply once approved.
Request access Already approved? Open the plannerIf you have not been approved, the planner will ask you to sign in and will not open.
Services
Assessments show where to look. Our team then supports the plant onsite and designs engineering solutions from the assessment results.
Shutdown management
The objective: complete the required work safely, within the planned duration, within budget and at the required quality, then return the plant to operation reliably.
Team
Reliability and asset management
Operations and maintenance leader across fixed plant operations, underground mining and industrial processing, with over a decade at Rio Tinto. Experience in concentrator plants, underground hoisting and critical fixed plant assets, leading teams and managing contractors. Mechanical engineer.
Reliability and asset management
More than 15 years in mining, underground fixed plant maintenance, condition monitoring, non-destructive testing and equipment integrity. Leads multidisciplinary reliability programs, facilitates root cause analysis and delivers predictive maintenance for critical mining assets.
Maintenance and shutdown planning
Planned maintenance, shutdown preparation, work management, scheduling, readiness tracking and execution coordination. Focus on quality work packs, scope control and better planning data, working with maintenance management systems and cross-functional teams.
Contact
Send us a short note and these four items. We use them to scope the visit and to price each budget line.
Write to us at: